| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ramkish42 Junior Member


Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 51
Location: Chennai as of now, Normally Naperville, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Related to the OP
This is evolution as seen
1. Matsya - Pisces
2. Kurma - Amphibians
3. Varaaha - Vertebrates
4. Nrusimha - Beastly man
5. Vaamana - Normal Man
Human evolution chain proceeds as follows
6. Parasu Raama - Aggresive and violent, might is right
7. Sri Raama - Soft and Dharmic minded, spreading dharma by leading as example
8. Bala Rama - Dharmic Minded, aggressive in imposing dharma, aggressive nature on imposing indicating degrading dharmic values
9. Sri Krishna - Dharmic Minded, however flexing dharma to suit the need, flexing nature indicates further degrading of dharmic values, confusion everywhere with many contradictory works
10 Kalki - Resetting original dharma _________________ Thanks and regards,
Ramkish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Ramkish,
So, based on your post, can I assume that Vaishnavas realize the stories in their scriptures are to be understood allegorically? That would be news to me. In the past I have only encountered Vaishnavas that follow works such as the Srimad Bhagavatam to the letter.
Is this a view of evolution particular to you, or is it common among Vaishnavas? _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ramkish42 Junior Member


Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 51
Location: Chennai as of now, Normally Naperville, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is just a thought that occured in my mind earlier over other forum when the question of evolution cropped up.
I just posted the same over here.
Vaishnavs and Bhagavatam, yes, you will find many gaudiya vaishnavs stick to bhagavatam and gita, as if they are not aware of existence of any other texts. That shows their love towards the said works
I belong to srivaishnava sect, popularised by Shrimad Ramanujaacharyar, follower of visishtadvaita, hence my thoughts normally would differ from brahma madhava gaudiya sampradaaya
We do not subscribe to goloka, garbodakasayi and kriyodakasayi thoughts. _________________ Thanks and regards,
Ramkish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are yaar, you guys use a lot of hindi words, and difficult english words.
dont wory, i will learn it soon  _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | ManuSmriti is the most (in)famous "dharmasastra" - a law-book like the constitution that defines how a society is to behave etc..
The first chapter speaks only of creation and theology, followed by it are the rules the society has to pertain to.
The book is infamous for its short-sighted interpretation make it look like the source of caste suppression with tremendous criticising of shudras. Whether it is or no, it surely stems from the interpretaion and not the book itself. |
namaste PD,
so where thus this book come from, who wrote it. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste,
As we seem to be drifting off-topic, I thought I would start a new thread devoted to Manu Smriti which can be found by clicking here. Please direct any further discussion of Manu Smriti to this new thread.
This thread will remain devoted to discussing the Theory of Evolution as a whole. _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying to find a detailed article related to Samkhya Philosophy that i encountered before. Even the wikipedia article will help in this topic (no, i didn't mess about with this one).
From what i can remember, samkhya philosophy ignores ishwara as its prime motive is to discriminate between purusa and prakrti. Either the sutras or their commentaries suggest that the cosmos and solar system etc.. evolved because of purusa itself - in the sense, the earth has its spirit and so does the sun; and they evolved into the state we know today due to evolution of purusa.
What i dont understand is - why aren't we taught that indians already proposed evolution!
Ramkish, with all due respect - this forum is arya samaji; and the arya samajists reject puraanas and certain other scriptures so it is best we abstain from discussing anything related to puraanas. I'm also sanatana dharmik (advaitin, smartha sampradaya) and I abstain from such topics as well ^_^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | I'm trying to find a detailed article related to Samkhya Philosophy that i encountered before. Even the wikipedia article will help in this topic (no, i didn't mess about with this one).
From what i can remember, samkhya philosophy ignores ishwara as its prime motive is to discriminate between purusa and prakrti. Either the sutras or their commentaries suggest that the cosmos and solar system etc.. evolved because of purusa itself - in the sense, the earth has its spirit and so does the sun; and they evolved into the state we know today due to evolution of purusa.
What i dont understand is - why aren't we taught that indians already proposed evolution! what do you mean????
Ramkish, with all due respect - this forum is arya samaji; and the arya samajists reject puraanas and certain other scriptures so it is best we abstain from discussing anything related to puraanas. I'm also sanatana dharmik (advaitin, smartha sampradaya) and I abstain from such topics as well ^_^ |
i think everybody has to say something, so let him speak. i dont think Shis wil mind. i just think he wil like the discusion  _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I wasn't criticising ramkish - what i'm saying is that when samkhya philosophy clearly teaches us evolution - infact is a major postulate, yet we aren't taught about it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | | I wasn't criticising ramkish - what i'm saying is that when samkhya philosophy clearly teaches us evolution - infact is a major postulate, yet we aren't taught about it! |
oke .
uhhhhhhhhhh whats "taught "  _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
we're taught that the west came up with the concept of evolution first by some frenchman then by charles darwin.....
Fact is that we came up with the concept of evolution first and it was much more refined for its times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | we're taught that the west came up with the concept of evolution first by some frenchman then by charles darwin.....
Fact is that we came up with the concept of evolution first and it was much more refined for its times. |
ok, but what is the evolution concept bij Hindoes _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
It would be difficult to explain that until i find a good article explaining samkhya philosophy.
Samkhya philosophy basically ignores concept of ishvara, by saying that everything in the universe - from organisms to galaxies - evolved out of evolution by the union of purusha(consciousness) with prakrti(matter-cum-energy). It doesn't howver stick to the concept of natural selection, it is simply progressive evolution; which periodically also shows decline in progress into apah(water). It supports the yuga concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste PD,
I, too, am looking for a good article related to Samkhya. However, I have also thought it might be a good idea to write something myself, perhaps comparing several 'evolutionary systems' found in Indian philosophy. I was thinking it would be interesting to compare and contrast traditional Samkhya (i.e. that of Ishvarakrishna), Patanjali's system, Sankara's system and Traitavada of Swami Dayanand. If you run across a good article on Samkhya, please do send me a link in a PM and we will get a thread started on it.
Also, I thought one other distinction between Vedic 'evolution' and that of Darwin might be worth mentioning. In Darwin's evolution, random mutation plays a central role. Samkhya (or any 'evolutionary' system in Vedic thought) however, claims the opposite, i.e. that no 'mutation' could ever be considered 'random'. _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Shishya,
Yes i know that Samkhya is opposed to Darwinianism that's why i said "progressive evolution" unlike "natural selection"
In satyarth prakash and manu smrti the cosmic evolution has been described to a certain extent (agni from apah etc)
I'd have to find some good sankhya sutras to seek the explanation of samkhya evolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste,
Maby Niranjan, can explain more over the evolution here, than to start a new topic. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shishya wrote: | Namasta Prabhat, Hiten and PD,
This is a very important and complicated topic. I have plans to write a longer article on this subject sometime in the near future, but I can give a short answer in the form of a few jumbled notes for now. Hopefully it will suffice for the time being.
First, Hiten: You were correct in your statement regarding Tibet. The Vedic name for this region is Trivishtap, and it is considered the birthplace of mankind.
Second, regarding the theory of evolution: It is vital to remember that it is and will forever remain a theory. The reason for this is that it cannot be proven, only assumed based on the evidence available. But any honest scientist will tell you that Darwin's theory is not the only one which could explain the available evidence. It is just the most widely publicized.
Vaidik Dharma teaches that God created man, and not that he is the product of spontaneous and random mutation as the theory of evolution claims. And this is really the crux of the whole argument, for it boils down to one point:
Do you think the world - as well all the creatures in it - is the product of blind chance or of intelligent design? Or in other words: Are you an atheist or theist? For only an atheist could believe that the world is the product of blind chance, and to believe in an intelligently ordered world is to presuppose the existence of a Divine Being who transcends creation.
Evolution, as a theory divorced from theism and which claims that man evolved from other, more primitive forms of life, rests squarely upon a belief in 'chance' - a belief which is supported by neither the Vedas nor by any other branch of modern science. Therefore, I reject it outright as a viable explanation for the origin of man.
As PD mentioned, however, evolution as a principle of creation in no way conflicts with Vedic teachings. But God is always the guiding intelligence behind that evolution.
I know that's not really a complete or satisfying answer, but I think the conversation will continue, giving us the chance to discuss things in more detail.  |
Namaste Shisya,
So bro, did you find any information abouth it. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1162
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Shis,
koi bhaat nahai, i wil keep reminding you  _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ashokakirti Freshman Member

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Folks!!
If you do not mind, I have some questions. How do we know that there is GOD and the GOD created us? In fact, what is GOD exactly?
thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|