| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jay Freshman Member


Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:05 pm Post subject: What is the difference between the Arya Samaj and Hinduism? |
|
|
Hello,
What is the difference between the Arya Samaj and Hinduism? Are the two mutually exclusive, or are they the same thing?
-Jay |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Explain Hinduism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Jay and Prabhat,
Good point, Prabhat. Hinduism is a very tough 'religion' to define - which makes it all the more difficult to contrast it with Vaidika Dharma.
However, I think there is at least one main point which is easiest to identify as distinguishing Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma) from the Arya Samaj (Vaidika Dharma): Belief in the Vedas.
Of course, both Sanatans and Aryas profess belief in the Vedas, but only the Aryas do so consequently and consistently. They do not accept other works next to the Vedas as being of a superior order - as do the Sanatans with their Puranas. For this reason, Sanatans are often rightly calles Pauranics - for they place more belief in the Puranas than in the Vedas themselves.
In this vein of thought, Pauranic Hinduism is not compatible with the teachings of Vaidika Dharma. True, they share much in the way of common beliefs, but their differences are too great to be ignored.
For example, Pauranics often believe in a multitude of gods and goddesses. The Arya Samaj believes in only one God with an infinite number of attributes. This is the original teaching of the Vedas and all true Shastras.
There are other important points, but as the Arya Samaj is a society which upholds Vaidika Dharma above all else, I think this the most important one. _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so how come they say. that the gods and so al al written in de Vedas
that means they read it differend than the Arya's. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Prabhat,
The most popular commentator on the Vedas among the Pauranics is Madhava Sayana, who - due to the influences of his time - interpreted everything in a literal and materialistic fashion. This posioned not only the minds of the authors of several of the Puranas, but also the minds of the westerners that came to India to translate the Vedas in the 18th and 19th centuries.
There is a very important chapter of B. C. Singh's book, Life and Teachings of Swami Dayanand Saraswati, which studies this issue in great depth. Particularly interesting is the section on Madhava Sayana. There it is explained how the Pauranics arrive at the conclusions they do regarding the Vedas, as well as how Swamiji showed the flaws in their argumentation. It is very highly recommended. _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heavy stuf.
and stil i cant believe that people in India and outside stil believe thats this is the true religion. did you ever think about it that there are so many people who's religion is sanatan. and that people in the west get confused about it, so many gods.
if people start practisc Vaidikh, than no one would stop it. and i think we wil had a lot of with people in it olso. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is....
they take the line
'puraanas and itihasa form the fifth veda'
and manipulate it to their desire.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | The thing is....
they take the line
'puraanas and itihasa form the fifth veda'
and manipulate it to their desire.... |
fifth??????? _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I remember reading it in satyarth prakash.....
Dayananda explains that they are two in the five names given to the brahmanas [dont ask me what they are, i can't recall that part..] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
i heard there are 6 vedas. 2 are stolen by the germans. thats why they could make the long distand bom.
but if it is true, Only Gods know.
namaste. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Prabhat, you sound like the pauraaniks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | | Prabhat, you sound like the pauraaniks! |
Namaste PD,
i wish i could say i am a good Arya, but i am not.
but i wil tell you i am NOT a sanatan, please.
i only tell what i have heard. 8) _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste PD and Prabhat,
The notion of the 'fifth Veda' is mostly based upon Chhaandogya Upanishad 7.1.2:
rigvedam bhagavao adhyemi yajurvedam saamavedam aatharvanam chaturtham itihaasa puraanam panchamam...
"Blessed One, I know the Rig Veda, the Yajur Veda, the Saama Veda, and the Atharva Veda fourth, the Itihaasas and Puranaas fifth..."
Pauranics claim this as supporting the notion that the Puranas should be considered as the 'fifth Veda', when in fact it is simply a listing of the fields of knowledge aqcuired by the speaker. He goes on to say:
"...I know grammar, the ancestral rites, arithmetic, portents, discernment, disputation, ethics, etymology, theology (lit.: brahmavidyaa, 'knowledge of God'), metaphysics (lit.: bhuutavidyaa, 'knowledge of the elements'), governance (lit.:kshatravidyaa, 'knowledge of rulers'), astronomy (lit.: nakshatravidyaa, 'knowledge of the constellations'), and the company of the wise (lit.: sarpadevajanavidyaa, 'knowledge of the wise ones who wander the earth')."
If the whole passage is quoted, it becomes clear that the individual is simply listing off the fields of knowledge he has studied. This is no 'proof' that the Puranas are actually to be considered equal to the Vedas.
Besides, such a claim ignores several other facts:
-This is written in a Upanishad and not in the Vedas themselves.
-This is one individual speaking about his personal experience/opinion.
-The title 'fifth Veda' has been given to a number of disciplines as a matter of courtesy throughout time. This is simply to designate their importance to the people and not their inherent value in relation to the Vedas. _________________ Namaste,
Shishya
ॐ
ॐ सह नावतु । सह तौ भुनक्तु । सह वीर्यं करवावहै । तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु मा विद्विषावहै ॥
"Together may we be protected. Together may we be profited. Together may we do a hero's work. May we learn intelligently. May we never hate one another."
-Brihadaranyaka & Taittiriya Upanishads |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Just one thing - "Sanatana dharma" is not vedanta-pauraanik dharma. They consider puraanas for layman, advaitin and mostly smarthic (god can be perceived as you wish, but is otherwise formless) - i'm a sanatana dharmic with lots of arya samajik beliefs... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gaudiya vaishnavs! They dont even follow the gita properly which says one should perform all the vedic rituals or even chant the gayatri mantra! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shishya Administrator


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1985
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jay Freshman Member


Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, I see my question has sparked quite a response. Thanks, everyone.
So, this is what I have gathered so far:
The Arya Samaj practices and promotes the vedic religion, the oldest (original) form of religiosity known to man - in other words, the original, universal spirituality of humanity.
Hinduism, on the other hand, practices a form of religion derived from the Vedas, but which has (partly) strayed from the truth of the Vedas by incorperating non-Vedic elements such as polytheism, idol worship, incarnations of god, etc.
Does that pretty much sum things up?
Thanks,
-Jay |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Namaste Jay,
in headline this is the truth
but i dont think promot is a good word choice, by speaking abouth it in groups, its better to reach to people who is intrested in the Vedas. that makes them more currious and ask more questions. _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jay Freshman Member


Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I think there is a difference between 'promoting' and 'preaching'. I didn't want to say 'preaching', for the very reason that Prabhat mentioned.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Hinduism, on the other hand, practices a form of religion derived from the Vedas, but which has (partly) strayed from the truth of the Vedas by incorperating non-Vedic elements such as polytheism, idol worship, incarnations of god, etc. |
Dont sound like abrahamics! Its not idolatry, its iconic worship and henotheism not polytheism!! (i.e., one god with subservient demi-gods) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shyena Gold Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 964
Location: Hyderabad, AP
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PD wrote: | | Quote: | | Hinduism, on the other hand, practices a form of religion derived from the Vedas, but which has (partly) strayed from the truth of the Vedas by incorperating non-Vedic elements such as polytheism, idol worship, incarnations of god, etc. |
Dont sound like abrahamics! Its not idolatry, its iconic worship and henotheism not polytheism!! (i.e., one god with subservient demi-gods) |
EDIT: I was reading that arya samaj was defamed by mahatma gandhi... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prabhat Platinum Member


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1171
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jay wrote: | Well, I think there is a difference between 'promoting' and 'preaching'. I didn't want to say 'preaching', for the very reason that Prabhat mentioned.  |
Namaste Jay,
please say what ever you want, it just helps me more to understand  _________________ Namaste,
Prabhat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|